What Ahmadinejad said
September 25th, 2010>>It was said that some three thousand people were killed on the 11th September for which we are all very saddened. Yet, up until now, in Afghanistan and Iraq hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, millions wounded and displaced and the conflict is still going on and expanding. In identifying those responsible for the attack, there were three viewpoints.
1. That a very powerful and complex terrorist group, able to successfully cross all layers of the American intelligence and security, carried out the attack. This is the main viewpoint advocated by American statesmen.
2. That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order also to save the Zionist regime. The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view.
3. It was carried out by a terrorist group but the American government supported and took advantage of the situation. Apparently, this viewpoint has fewer proponents.
The main evidence linking the incident was a few passports found in the huge volume of rubble and a video of an individual whose place of domicile was unknown but it was announced that he had been involved in oil deals with some American officials. It was also covered up and said that due to the explosion and fire no trace of the suicide attackers was found. There remain, however, a few questions to be answered:
1. Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?
2. Assuming the viewpoint of the American government, is it rational to launch a classic war through widespread deployment of troops that led to the death of hundreds of thousands ofpeople to counter a terrorist group?
3. Was it not possible to act the way Iran countered the Riggi terrorist group who killed and wounded 400 innocent people in Iran. In the Iranian operation no innocent person was hurt.
It is proposed that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of the 11 September so that in the future expressing views about it is not forbidden.<< Ahmadinedschad beim UN-Redemarathon, im Video ab 10:06:
September 25th, 2010 at 16:10
Elsässer zu Ahmadinedjad:
Wo er Recht hat, hat er Recht
http://tinyurl.com/3ab85k8
September 26th, 2010 at 21:47
@klaus: und wo genau hatter recht?
September 27th, 2010 at 22:42
@ Xenu’s Pasta
Da fehlen nur die Anführungszeichen, das ist Elsässers Überschrift!
September 28th, 2010 at 01:52
Öhm, OK, Zeichensetzung war diesmal signifikant (pun intended). Mir entschwindet allerdings die Signifikanz, die Elsässer auf die Thesen ausübt.
Oder auch: Ahmadinejad wirds egal sein, was Elsässer dazu sagt. Elsässer wirds nicht egal sein, möglichst breit gelesen zu werden.
October 2nd, 2010 at 20:20
Der Pasdaranhäuptling schafft es einfach nicht intellektuell über seine armselige Geheimpolizistenmentalität hinauszuwachsen. Die Wahrheit ist nicht dasjenige Konstrukt welches die vielversprechendsten Aussichten bietet den jeweiligen Opponenten am umfassendsten zu belasten, sondern das was tatsächlich geschehen ist ohne repressive Retuschierungen. Wenn etwa James Jay Lee mit seiner Kamikaze-Aktion versucht hat sich aus einem CIA-Gehirnwäscheprogramm freizukämpfen dann heißt das nicht dass es eine Aktion der CIA war, auch wenn er sie ohne die Mißbrauchserfahrung vielleicht so nicht veranstaltet hätte. Derartige Aktionen sind mehr oder weniger verständige Versuche eine gesellschaftliche Notbremse zu ziehen – selbst wenn es einem persönlich nichts mehr nützen sollte um die ideologische Umzingelung zu durchbrechen kann es anderen Mißbrauchsbetroffenen im geteilten Gefangenendilemma unvorhergesehene politische Chancen eröffnen. Ohne das von Ahmadinejad berührte Beispiel würden wir uns heute womöglich nicht im Unabhängigkeitskrieg gegen die Überwachungsregimes befinden sondern nach wie vor in deren babylonischer Gefangenschaft, ganz so wie auch der Angriff auf Fort Sumter unter der Fahne der Sklavenhalter paradoxerweise als Auslöser der Emanzipation zur Wirkung kam.